Bundle-o-graphy: improving structural connectivity estimation with adaptive microstructure-informed tractography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tractography is a powerful tool for the investigation of the complex organization of the brain in vivo, as it allows inferring the macroscopic pathways of the major fiber bundles of the white matter based on non-invasive diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions. Despite this unique and compelling ability, some studies have exposed the poor anatomical accuracy of the reconstructions obtained with this technique and challenged its effectiveness for studying brain connectivity. In this work, we describe a novel method to readdress tractography reconstruction problem in a global manner by combining the strengths of so-called generative and discriminative strategies. Starting from an input tractogram, we parameterize the connections between brain regions following a bundle-based representation that allows to drastically reducing the number of parameters needed to model groups of fascicles. The parameters space is explored following an MCMC generative approach, while a discrimininative method is exploited to globally evaluate the set of connections which is updated according to Bayes' rule. Our results on both synthetic and real brain data show that the proposed solution, called bundle-o-graphy, allows improving the anatomical accuracy of the reconstructions while keeping the computational complexity similar to other state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".