MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295993398 · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.036

Erratum to “Effect of Simulation-based Training on Surgical Proficiency and Patient Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Clinical and Educational Trial” [Eur Urol 2022;81:385–393]

2022· erratum· en· W4295993398 on OpenAlexaff
Abdüllatif Aydın, Kamran Ahmed, Takashige Abe, Nicholas Raison, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Hans Garmo, Hashim U. Ahmed, Furhan Mukhtar, Ahmed Al‐Jabir, Oliver Brunckhorst, Nobuo Shinohara, Wei Zhu, Guohua Zeng, John P. Sfakianos, Mantu Gupta, Ashutosh Tewari, Ali Serdar Gözen, Jens Rassweiler, Andreas Skolarikos, Thomas Kunit, Thomas Knoll, Felix Moltzahn, George N. Thalmann, Andrea G. Lantz Powers, Ben H. Chew, Kemal Sarıca, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Umair Baig, H. Aya, Mohammed Husnain Iqbal, Francesca Kum, Matthew Bultitude, Jonathan D. Glass, Azhar Abbas Khan, Jonathan Makanjuola, John E. McCabe, Azi Samsuddin, Craig McIlhenny, James Brewin, Shashank Kulkarni, Sikandar Khwaja, Md Waliul Islam, Howard Marsh, Taher Bhat, Benjamin J. Thomas, Mark L. Cutress, Fadi Housami, Timothy Nedas, T. S. Bates, Rono Mukherjee, Stuart L. Graham, M Bordenave, Charles Coker, Shwan Ahmed, Andrew Symes, Robert C. Calvert, C.O. Lynch, Ronán Long, Jacob M. Patterson, Nicholas J. Rukin, Shahid Ali Khan, Ranan Dasgupta, Stephen L. Brown, Ben Grey, Waseem Mahmalji, Wayne Lam, W Scheitlin, Norbert Saelzler, Marcel Fiedler, Shuhei Ishikawa, Yoshihiro Sasaki, Ataru Sazawa, Yuichiro Shinno, Tango Mochizuki, Jan Peter Jessen, Roland Steiner, Gunnar Wendt‐Nordahl, Nabil Atassi, Heiko Kohns, Ashley Cox, Ricardo Rendon, Joseph Lawen, Greg Bailly, T. Donald Marsh

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapySimulation trainingMedical physicsRandomized controlled trialGeneral surgerySurgerySimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean UrologySame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207