MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296022518 · doi:10.3390/s22186928

PINE: Post-Quantum Based Incentive Technique for Non-Cooperating Nodes in Internet of Everything

2022· article· en· W4296022518 on OpenAlexaff
Ashwin Balaji, Sanjay Kumar Dhurandher, Isaac Woungang

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRelayComputer networkEnergy consumptionIncentiveThe InternetEncryptionProtocol (science)Distributed computingComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Everything (IoE) is a smart system that interconnects smart entities by incorporating low-cost or low-energy gadgets that are useful for communication with people, processes, data, and devices/things. In such an instantaneously connected environment, network-enabled heterogeneous devices may exhibit non-cooperative behaviour which may lead to the degradation of the network. To address this performance degradation, the proposed Post-quantum based Incentive technique for Non-cooperating nodes in internet of Everything (PINE) protocol provides an end-to-end reliable solution by incorporating location-aware post-quantum encryption in these networks while addressing the non-cooperative behaviour of the nodes by employing an effective strategy in a bi-directional multi-hop relay environment. This proposed protocol further aims to evaluate the consequences of non-cooperative nodes by considering various metrics, namely, number of nodes, message size, execution time, memory consumption, average residual energy, percentage of selfish nodes, and blackhole nodes detection, aiming to achieve significant accuracy in an IoE environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207