MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296053755 · doi:10.3233/faia220257

Exudates Detection Based on SSD MobileNet for Referable Diabetic Retinopathy

2022· book-chapter· en· W4296053755 on OpenAlexaff
Zaira García-Nonoal, Mariko Nakano-Miyatake, Hector Perez‐Meana, Ana González-H.León

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetic retinopathyOphthalmologyOptometryRetinopathyArtificial intelligenceDiabetes mellitusComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic detection of the referable Diabetic Retinopathy (RDR) has become essential in diabetic patients, especially who live in the remote regions, to avoid a serious visual impairment. For this reason, different approaches have been developed with the aim of detect and segment the principal DR lesions for automatic diagnosis of the RDR. Exudate is one of the DR lesions and if these lesions appear in the macular region, a diabetic macular edema (DME) can be suspected and a detailed analysis by ophthalmologist is required. Then it is important to detect these lesions with their position related to the macular region to determine the danger level. This paper presents an automatic method to localize the exudates and optic disc (OD) using Single Shot Detector (SSD) scheme based on MobileNet-V1 as base network to determine if the risk of DME exits to indicate patients the necessity of consultation by ophthalmologist. The proposed system is evaluated using MESSIDOR Database, providing 89.15% accuracy, 88.17% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applicationsSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207