MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296061840 · doi:10.55365/1923.x2022.20.17

How Manager Characteristic affects Capital Structure in Malaysian Manufacturing Sector: A Formative PLS-SEM Approach

2022· article· en· W4296061840 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wen-Cheng Hu, Yoke Kuah

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Economics and Finance · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital structureLeverage (statistics)BusinessFormative assessmentCapital (architecture)Industrial organizationLimitingWorking capitalEconomic capitalFinanceEconomicsHuman capitalEconomic growthComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Access to capital is a critical factor in stimulating small business formation and growth.The failure of small business entities in securing the needed capital would entail them remaining small and limiting their ability.Thus, financial decisions by the management are crucial in ensuring that the firm's capital structure is optimal.This study focuses on manufacturing SME companies to examine the influence of manager characteristics (age, gender working experience, level of education) on capital structure towards technology improvement.Based on the survey of 219 respondents using the PLS-SEM approach, the results showed that only level of study and working experience were positively and significantly affecting capital structure preferences and caused technology improvement in the company.It is concluded that different managements have different leverage privileges with managers trying to attain optimal capital structure.This study would be of immense help to managers to make sound decisions regarding the composition of their capital structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Economics and FinanceSame topicCorporate Finance and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207