MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296065773 · doi:10.1353/nai.2022.0003

The Black Shoals: Offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies by Tiffany Lethabo King

2022· article· en· W4296065773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary McNeil

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoalIndigenousColonialismHistoryArchaeologyOceanographyEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Black Shoals: Offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies by Tiffany Lethabo King Mary McNeil (bio) The Black Shoals: Offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies by Tiffany Lethabo King Duke University Press, 2019 IN THE BLACK SHOALS, Tiffany Lethabo King argues that although the transatlantic slave trade and Indigenous genocide are distinct phenomena within a larger violent "conquistador-settler" project, they "can never be bracketed . . . from one another" (xi, 200–201). Leading from this argument, King theorizes Black and Indigenous radical possibilities as co-constitutive, asserting that "the most radical of Black and Indigenous projects—abolition and decolonization—exceed the horizons of freedom currently imagined by a White leftist imaginary and discourses of settler colonialism" (208). Thus, King troubles Western epistemologies by staging a "multivoiced conversation" between Black studies and Native American and Indigenous studies (xiii). In order to grapple with Western constructions of the "human" as an ontological category that excludes Blackness and Indigeneity, King grounds The Black Shoals in the works of Black studies scholars such as Frank Wilderson, Sylvia Wynter, and Hortense Spillers. The Black Shoals is also heavily informed by analytics from the subfields of Caribbean and Black Canadian studies. Of particular significance are Kamau Brathwaite's "tidalectics," Édouard Glissant's "errantry," and Katherine McKittrick's "black Atlantic livingness," which challenge colonial models of rootedness, exile, and value. Next, King stages a conversation between Black studies and Native studies in order to "trace the contours of a shared speech" of conquest (21). Finally, King critiques the limited grammars that white-dominated knowledge fields use in conceptualizing genocide and slavery. This is the theoretical foundation upon which King analyzes cultural production. King's book is anchored by the analytic of the shoal. An ever-changing space where ocean and land meet just beyond the shore, King uses the shoal as a metaphor to describe the "liminal, indeterminate, and hard to map" conceptual space where Black studies and Native studies might be able to engage with one another on their own terms (3). King also conceives of the shoal in active terms, drawing upon the use of "shoal" as a verb that describes a ship's navigation of shallow and rocky terrain near a coast. To "shoal" is to carefully navigate a space that resists definite mapping. Thus, shoaling necessitates the careful creation of new language to describe the [End Page 152] interconnectedness of Black and Indigenous experiences of conquest, genocide, and slavery. While the first two chapters of The Black Shoals primarily critique conquistador-settler epistemologies, the latter three attend to the ways in which cultural producers imagine other possibilities for Black and Native people. Chapters 1 and 2 analyze the 2015 defacing of Boston's Christopher Columbus statue with red paint and a Black Lives Matter tag; Toni Morrison, Junot Díaz, and Leslie Marmon Silko's meditations on conquest; William Gerard de Brahm's "1757 Map of the Coast of South Carolina and Parts of Georgia"; and the correspondence of enslaver Eliza Lucas Pinckney. In looking at these disparate objects, King makes three primary arguments. First, King argues that a shared grammar of conquest is most apt in conceptualizing Native genocide and Black enslavement. Second, King critiques settler-colonial studies' framing of settler-colonialism as a "land-centered" rather than "genocide-centered" project, arguing that such framing obscures settler-colonialism's inherent violence (69). Third, King asserts that while the conquistador-settler marshaled cartography as a tool through which to rationalize the "crafting and sustaining of European human life and self-actualization through Black and Indigenous death," eighteenth-century maps and correspondence reveal the limits and anxieties of "conquistador humanism" (84). In the last three chapters, King returns to de Brahm's map and attends to four new cultural objects: Julie Dash's film, Daughters of the Dust; the film's literary sequel; Tiya Miles's novel, The Cherokee Rose; and Charmaine Lurch's sculpture, Revisiting Sycorax. King employs analytics of porosity, fugitivity, fungibility, erotics, and ceremony to analyze the ways that these artists imagine other possibilities for Black and Native people. Such possibilities are rooted in a disruption of labor as the "governing frame . . . for understanding Black embodiment on plantation...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNative American and Indigenous StudiesSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207