MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296095559 · doi:10.3390/curroncol29090517

In Silico Identification and Validation of Cuproptosis-Related LncRNA Signature as a Novel Prognostic Model and Immune Function Analysis in Colon Adenocarcinoma

2022· article· en· W4296095559 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yue Wang, Xulong Huang, Siyu Chen, Huajuan Jiang, Huanan Rao, Lijie Lu, Feiyan Wen, Jin Pei

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn silicoSignature (topology)Identification (biology)MedicineComputational biologyAdenocarcinomaColorectal cancerColon adenocarcinomaImmune systemFunction (biology)BioinformaticsBiologyInternal medicineCancerImmunologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is the most common subtype of colon cancer, and cuproptosis is a recently newly defined form of cell death that plays an important role in the development of several malignant cancers. However, studies of cuproptosis-related lncRNAs (CRLs) involved in regulating colon adenocarcinoma are limited. The purpose of this study is to develop a new prognostic CRLs signature of colon adenocarcinoma and explore its underlying biological mechanism. Methods: In this study, we downloaded RNA-seq profiles, clinical data and tumor mutational burden (TMB) data from the TCGA database, identified cuproptosis-associated lncRNAs using univariate Cox, lasso regression analysis and multivariate Cox analysis, and constructed a prognostic model with risk score based on these lncRNAs. COAD patients were divided into high- and low-risk subgroups based on the risk score. Cox regression was also used to test whether they were independent prognostic factors. The accuracy of this prognostic model was further validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), C-index and Nomogram. In addition, the lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network and protein−protein interaction (PPI) network were constructed based on the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Results: We constructed a prognostic model based on 15 cuproptosis-associated lncRNAs. The validation results showed that the risk score of the model (HR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.001−1.004; p < 0.001) could serve as an independent prognostic factor with accurate and credible predictive power. The risk score had the highest AUC (0.793) among various factors such as risk score, stage, gender and age, also indicating that the model we constructed to predict patient survival was better than other clinical characteristics. Meanwhile, the possible biological mechanisms of colon adenocarcinoma were explored based on the lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA ceRNA network and PPI network constructed by WGCNA. Conclusion: The prognostic model based on 15 cuproptosis-related lncRNAs has accurate and reliable predictive power to effectively predict clinical outcomes in colon adenocarcinoma patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207