Automated Fluid Intake Detection Using RGB Videos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dehydration is a common, serious issue among older adults. It is important to drink fluid to prevent dehydration and the complications that come with it. As many older adults forget to drink regularly, there is a need for an automated approach, tracking intake throughout the day with limited user interaction. The current literature has used vision-based approaches with deep learning models to detect drink events; however, most use static frames (2D networks) in a lab-based setting, only performing eating and drinking. This study proposes a 3D convolutional neural network using video segments to detect drinking events. In this preliminary study, we collected data from 9 participants in a home simulated environment performing daily activities as well as eating and drinking from various containers to create a robust environment and dataset. Using state-of-the-art deep learning models, we trained our CNN using both static images and video segments to compare the results. The 3D model attained higher performance (compared to 2D CNN) with F1 scores of 93.7% and 84.2% using 10-fold and leave-one-subject-out cross-validations, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".