Predicting nonlinear dynamics of short-lived penaeid shrimp species in the Gulf of Mexico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predicting the dynamics of harvested species is essential for assessing stock status and establishing index-based management strategies. However, conventional approaches for short-lived species predict dynamics poorly, possibly because unobserved interactions with other species and abiotic factors are often treated as noise. Alternatively, the empirical dynamic modeling (EDM) approach, which uses the time delays of the observed states to compensate for unobserved interactions, may improve the predictions for short-lived species. We test this idea using time series data of two federally managed, short-lived penaeid shrimp species, whose abundances were surveyed over 30 years (1987–2018) across the US Gulf of Mexico. We show that ( i) abundance dynamics of these annual shrimp stocks are well-predicted by EDM, ( ii) the dynamics are spatially similar across most of the gulf, and ( iii) the stock dynamics are characterized by nonlinear density-dependent interaction and vary with temperature. Our findings suggest that EDM may be more responsive than single-species, catch-at-age models in assessing the stock dynamics for short-lived penaeid shrimp species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".