Blockchain-Based Credential Management for Anonymous Authentication in SAGVN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a blockchain-based collaborative credential management scheme for anonymous authentication in space-air-ground integrated vehicular networks (SAGVN), namedSAG-BC. First, we build a consortium blockchain among service providers and design a distributed system setup (DSS) scheme to securely generate public parameters for issuing credentials. Second, we design a collaborative credential issuance (CCI) scheme to generate a succinct and easy-to-manage subscription credential. The credential can be used by users to access different access points in SAGVN efficiently without revealing true identities from the authentication messages. With co-designs of zero-knowledge proofs and succinct on-chain commitments,SAG-BCprovides efficient verifiability and incentives for credential management operations in SAGVN. By doing so, expensive on-chain storage and computational overheads are reduced in the DSS and CCI. Finally, we conduct a thorough security analysis to demonstrate thatSAG-BCachieves security and verifiability for credential management in SAGVN. We set up a real-world blockchain network and conduct extensive experiments to show the feasibility and efficiency ofSAG-BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".