Implementation of Energy-Efficient Auto Clustering Framework for Improving Quality of Service in IoT-enabled WSN Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In today’s world, emerging Internet of Things (IoT) technology have the most potential to extend the influence of the internet through IoT-enabled devices in futuristic fields such as smart healthcare, commercial, and industrial applications. Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is utilized for sensing and communication processes over IoT-based applications. However, the battery energy of the sensor nodes is restricted in IoT-enabled WSN (IWSN) owing to its irreplaceable ability. Most of the existing clustering schemes lagged to mitigate the control packet overhead problem since it consumes extra energy for data computation, gathering, and forwarding tasks at any environmental conditions. In this paper, a novel Energy-Efficient Auto Clustering (EEAC) framework has been proposed to develop the effective IWSN model with enhanced quality of service. The EEAC framework comprises three phases such as zone formation, node classification, and auto clustering phases. The objective of the first phase is to significantly form the different zones by alleviating the hotspot problem. Subsequently, the fuzzy logic algorithm is employed in the second phase to classify the nodes as Master, Sub-Master, and member nodes. Finally, the third phase of the proposed framework will accomplish the auto clustering mechanism based on hop information received from the reported packet. The performance results evident that the proposed EEAC framework obtains a lesser energy consumption of 0.01J during dense network and the network lifetime is prolonged up to 48% when compared with existing state-of-the-art clustering models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".