MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296163310 · doi:10.1113/ep090690

Brachial artery responses to acute hypercapnia: The roles of shear stress and adrenergic tone

2022· article· en· W4296163310 on OpenAlexafffund
Jay M. J. R. Carr, Philip N. Ainslie, Connor A. Howe, Travis D. Gibbons, Michael M. Tymko, Andrew R. Steele, Ryan L. Hoiland, Gustavo Vizcardo‐Galindo, Alex Patrician, Courtney V. Brown, Hannah G. Caldwell, Joshua C. Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChesapeake Research Consortium
KeywordsHypercapniaBrachial arteryVasodilationMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaBlood pressureAcidosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? What are the contributions of shear stress and adrenergic tone to brachial artery vasodilatation during hypercapnia? What is the main finding and its importance? In healthy young adults, shear-mediated vasodilatation does not occur in the brachial artery during hypercapnia, as elevated α₁-adrenergic activity typically maintains vascular tone and offsets distal vasodilatation controlling flow. ABSTRACT: We aimed to assess the shear stress dependency of brachial artery (BA) responses to hypercapnia, and the α₁-adrenergic restraint of these responses. We hypothesized that elevated shear stress during hypercapnia would cause BA vasodilatation, but where shear stress was prohibited (via arterial compression), the BA would not vasodilate (study 1); and, in the absence of α₁-adrenergic activity, blood flow, shear stress and BA vasodilatation would increase (study 2). In study 1, 14 healthy adults (7/7 male/female, 27 ± 4 years) underwent bilateral BA duplex ultrasound during hypercapnia (partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide, +10.2 ± 0.3 mmHg above baseline, 12 min) via dynamic end-tidal forcing, and shear stress was reduced in one BA using manual compression (compression vs. control arm). Neither diameter nor blood flow was different between baseline and the last minute of hypercapnia (P = 0.423, P = 0.363, respectively) in either arm. The change values from baseline to the last minute, in diameter (%; P = 0.201), flow (ml/min; P = 0.234) and conductance (ml/min/mmHg; P = 0.503) were not different between arms. In study 2, 12 healthy adults (9/3 male/female, 26 ± 4 years) underwent the same design with and without α₁-adrenergic receptor blockade (prazosin; 0.05 mg/kg) in a placebo-controlled, double-blind and randomized design. BA flow, conductance and shear rate increased during hypercapnia in the prazosin control arm (interaction, P < 0.001), but in neither arm during placebo. Even in the absence of α₁-adrenergic restraint, downstream vasodilatation in the microvasculature during hypercapnia is insufficient to cause shear-mediated vasodilatation in the BA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207