MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296168227 · doi:10.26685/urncst.381

Efficacy of Pleurotus eryngii Mycelium Containers as an Alternative to Current Single-Use Plastic Based Methods

2022· article· en· W4296168227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and E-Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyceliumPleurotus eryngiiMushroomOysterContainer (type theory)Pulp and paper industryMaterials scienceHorticultureFood scienceComposite materialBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in takeout orders due to the mandated loss of dine-in options at restaurants. The significant rise in takeout has led to the use of single-use plastic containers that are currently made from materials such as polyethylene and expanded polystyrene (EPS). The aim of our research is to determine the effectiveness of Pleurotus eryngii (King oyster mushroom) based mycelium in replacing single-use takeout food containers. Methods: Variables such as flexural strength, permeability, insulation test, interactions between food and mycelium container, and decomposability in comparison to the common EPS takeout container. Various articles from scholarly sources such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Omni library were used to determine the anticipated results. Results (hypothesized): The flexural strength test will be greater than or equal to 0.43 mPa. The mycelium container should be able to stop various viscosities of food from diffusing through the container due to the hydrophobicity of the mycelia. The mycelium should have greater insulation capacity than the standard EPS container. Qualitative observations obtained for interactions between the mycelium container and food should be similar to the control EPS container. Discussion: The mycelium container will be an effective alternative to using single-use EPS containers due to all tested variables resulting in the same or greater capabilities than the EPS container. Conclusion: Overall, using mycelium containers as an alternative to single use plastic takeout containers would reduce plastic waste and emission pollution, having a positive impact on climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it