MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296173484 · doi:10.2196/36351

A 9-Year Teledermoscopy Service in New Zealand: Retrospective Service Review

2022· article· en· W4296173484 on OpenAlex
Novell Shu Chyng Teoh, Amanda Oakley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Dermatology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAttendanceMedical diagnosisRetrospective cohort studyMelanomaTeledermatologyPediatricsDermatologyTelemedicineHealth careInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: A teledermoscopy service was established in January 2010 wherein patients attended nurse-led clinics for the imaging of lesions of concern and remote diagnosis by a dermatologist. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review the number of visits, patient characteristics, the efficiency of the service, and the diagnoses made. METHODS: We evaluated the waiting times and diagnoses of skin lesions for all patient visits from January 1, 2010, to May 31, 2019. The relationships between patient characteristics and the diagnosis of melanoma were specifically analyzed. RESULTS: The teledermoscopy clinic was attended by 6479 patients for 11,005 skin lesions on 8805 occasions. Statistically significant risk factors for the diagnosis of melanoma and melanoma in situ were male sex (P<.001), European ethnicity (P=.001), an age of 65 to 74 years (P=.001), and Fitzpatrick skin type 2 (P=.001). Attendance was maximal during 2015 and 2016. The seasonal variations in visits from 2011 to 2018 revealed a consistent peak at the end of summer and a dip at the end of winter. In the year 2010, a total of 306 patients attended the clinic; 76.1% (233/306) of these patients were discharged to primary care, and 23.9% (73/306) were referred to a hospital for a specialist assessment. For patients who were diagnosed with suspected melanoma by a dermatologist from January 1, 2010, to May 31, 2019, the median waiting time for an imaging appointment was 44.5 (mean 57.9; range 8-218) days. The most common lesions diagnosed were benign naevus (2933/11,005, 26.7%), benign keratosis (2576/11,005, 23.4%), and keratinocytic cancer (1707/11,005, 15.5%); melanoma was suspected in 4.6% (507/11,005) of referred lesions. The positive predictive value of melanoma and melanoma in situ was 61.1% (320 true positives and 203 false positives). The number needed to treat (ie, the ratio of the total number of excisions to the number with a histological diagnosis of melanoma or melanoma in situ) was 2.02. CONCLUSIONS: A teledermoscopy service offered by nurse-led imaging clinics can provide efficient and convenient access to dermatology services by streamlining referrals to secondary care and prioritizing patients with skin cancer for treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it