MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296175740 · doi:10.3389/fmats.2022.971816

Multimodal data augmentation for digital twining assisted by artificial intelligence in mechanics of materials

2022· article· en· W4296175740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
FundersSafran
KeywordsComputer scienceFinite element methodComponent (thermodynamics)Representation (politics)Relation (database)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmData miningStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital twins in the mechanics of materials usually involve multimodal data in the sense that an instance of a mechanical component has both experimental and simulated data. These simulations aim not only to replicate experimental observations but also to extend the data. Whether spatially, temporally, or functionally, augmentation is needed for various possible uses of the components to improve the predictions of mechanical behavior. Related multimodal data are scarce, high-dimensional and a physics-based causality relation exists between observational and simulated data. We propose a data augmentation scheme coupled with data pruning, in order to limit memory requirements for high-dimensional augmented data. This augmentation is desirable for digital twining assisted by artificial intelligence when performing nonlinear model reduction. Here, data augmentation aims at preserving similarities in terms of the validity domain of reduced digital twins. In this article, we consider a specimen subjected to a mechanical test at high temperature, where the as-manufactured geometry may impact the lifetime of the component. Hence, an instance is represented by a digital twin that includes 3D X-Ray tomography data of the specimen, the related finite element mesh, and the finite element predictions of thermo-mechanical variables at several time steps. There is, thus, for each specimen, geometrical and mechanical information. Multimodal data, which couple different representation modalities together, are hard to collect, and annotating them requires a significant effort. Thus, the analysis of multimodal data generally suffers from the problem of data scarcity. The proposed data augmentation scheme aims at training a recommending system that recognizes a category of data available in a training set that has already been fully analyzed by using high-fidelity models. Such a recommending system enables the use of a ROM-net for fast lifetime assessment via local reduced-order models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it