MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296211812 · doi:10.1109/tai.2022.3207450

FaceTopoNet: Facial Expression Recognition Using Face Topology Learning

2022· article· en· W4296211812 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFacial expression recognitionComputer scienceFacial recognition systemFacial expressionTopology (electrical circuits)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Speech recognitionMathematicsCombinatoricsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prior work has shown that the order in which different components of the face are learned using a sequential learner can play an important role in the performance of facial expression recognition systems. We propose FaceTopoNet, an end-to-end deep model for facial expression recognition, which is capable of learning an effective tree topology of the face. Our model then traverses the learned tree to generate a sequence, which is then used to form an embedding to feed a sequential learner. The devised model adopts one stream for learning structure and one stream for learning texture. The structure stream focuses on the positions of the facial landmarks, whereas the main focus of the texture stream is on the patches around the landmarks to learn textural information. We then fuse the outputs of the two streams by utilizing an effective attention-based fusion strategy. We perform extensive experiments on four large-scale in-the-wild facial expression datasets—namely AffectNet, FER2013, ExpW, and real-world affective face database—and one lab-controlled dataset (Cohn–Kanade) to evaluate our approach. FaceTopoNet achieves state-of-the-art performance on three of the five datasets and obtains competitive results on the other two datasets. We also perform rigorous ablation and sensitivity experiments to evaluate the impact of different components and parameters in our model. Finally, we perform robustness experiments and demonstrate that FaceTopoNet is more robust against occlusions in comparison to other leading methods in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it