MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296235458 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7089838

THE HOME AND THE WORLD: FAMILY TIES AND MIGRANT EXPERIENCE IN SELECTED TEXTS OF ROHINTON MISTRY

2022· article· en· W4296235458 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rezwan Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamily tiesSociologyGender studiesGenealogyPsychologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The selected fiction of Rohinton Mistry encompasses a fictional world imbued with reality: the metropolitan, middle, and lower-middle-class Parsi family. The metropolis is usually identified as Bombay/Mumbai. The characters are stuck between poverty and religion, desperate to find a way out. The selected texts deal with themes which plague the society at large: class, gender, caste and official hierarchies. His selected fiction i.e., Tales from Firozsha Baag and Family Matters traverse the expanding circles of family, neighbourhood, community, and country. The family is an ambivalent space in Mistry’s oeuvre. It is a circumscribed space but still acts as a comforting space. It dives deep into the cosmos of feelings, relationships, attitudes and behaviours. His oeuvre acts as a microcosm where the home and the world are juxtaposed. Mistry's own experiences as an outsider in Canada led him to compare both. He unearths a peculiarity while comparing India to a multi-cultural land like Canada, which is the base of most of his fiction. Therefore, this piece of work aims to explore the ideas of family and community, the idea of a home left behind, and how the home and the world converse in selected texts of Rohinton Mistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→