MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296261134 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.983187

Hemocompatibility of micropatterned biomaterial surfaces is dependent on topographical feature size

2022· article· en· W4296261134 on OpenAlexafffund
Meghan E. Fallon, Hillary H. Le, Novella M. Bates, Yuan Yao, Evelyn K. F. Yim, Monica T. Hinds, Deirdre E.J. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOregon National Primate Research CenterNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsBiomaterialFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small-diameter synthetic vascular grafts that have improved hemocompatibility and patency remain an unmet clinical need due to thrombosis. A surface modification that has potential to attenuate these failure mechanisms while promoting an endothelial layer is the micropatterning of luminal surfaces. Anisotropic features have been shown to downregulate smooth muscle cell proliferation, direct endothelial migration, and attenuate platelet adhesion and activation. However, the effect of micropatterning feature size and orientation relative to whole blood flow has yet to be investigated within a systematic study. In this work, hemocompatibility of micropattern grating sizes of 2, 5, and 10 µm were investigated. The thrombogenicity of the micropattern surface modifications were characterized by quantifying FXIIa activity, fibrin formation, and static platelet adhesion in vitro . Additionally, dynamic platelet attachment and end-point fibrin formation were quantified using an established, flowing whole blood ex vivo non-human primate shunt model without antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapies. We observed a higher trend in platelet attachment and significantly increased fibrin formation for larger features. We then investigated the orientation of 2 µm gratings relative to whole blood flow and found no significant differences between the various orientations for platelet attachment, rate of linear platelet attachment, or end-point fibrin formation. MicroCT analysis of micropatterned grafts was utilized to quantify luminal patency. This work is a significant step in the development of novel synthetic biomaterials with improved understanding of hemocompatibility for use in cardiovascular applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207