The effect of bitumen molecular fractions on diffusivity and rheology of bitumen under <scp>high‐temperature</scp> conditions: Molecular dynamics ( <scp>MD</scp> ) simulation study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Heavy oil and bitumen play an incredible role in Canada's energy resources. The main processes that have already been applied to produce heavy oil and bitumen are in‐situ thermal methods. The primary mechanism of production in these reservoirs is a reduction in heavy oil and bitumen viscosities via heat transfer. Having deep knowledge about the rheological behaviour of heavy oil and bitumen is crucial to designing a more accurate and efficient in‐situ thermal recovery method. In this work, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was used to model the rheological behaviour of bitumen under different temperatures. According to MD outputs, the highest diffusion coefficient between bitumen fractions belongs to saturate fractions. On the other hand, the lowest diffusion coefficient belongs to asphaltene fractions. The size of asphaltene, its polarity, and the polarity of a resin fraction affect the diffusion coefficient of asphaltene in a bitumen sample and its rheological behaviour. The MD simulation aims to provide molecular insights and essential information about the rheological trend of bitumen under different thermodynamic conditions. The results of the current work provide essential information about the effect of bitumen fractions on its rheological behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".