MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296345035 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2040009/v1

How to reduce empathic distress and increase emotional skills in medical training? Experience of a Mindfulness-Based stress reduction class vs. control group in France

2022· preprint· en· W4296345035 on OpenAlexaff
Cloé Brami, Franck Zenasni, Liza Hettal, Florence Pasquier, Serge Sultan

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessEmpathyMindfulness-based stress reductionPsychologyClinical psychologyDistressIntervention (counseling)Stress managementPersonal distressPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Improving student wellness through curricular activities is a topic of interest in medical school. Both distress and well-being are related to medical student empathy. Numerous data suggest that learning mindfulness skills help to reduce anxiety, stress and overall psychological distress. Moreover, there are still poor data on the impact of MBSR on medical students' empathy and emotional skills. Methods: We designed a controlled study including an intervention group (MBSR) and a wait-list control group. We aimed to explore the impact of an MBSR training in medical students on (1) empathy (2) emotional skills (identification, understanding, acceptance) and (3) self-care. Online assessments occurred at baseline and post intervention. We analyzed pre-post changes and explored intervention effects using a generalized mixed model. Results: Fifty-one medical students were included. 80% of students attended all MBSR classes. When compared with the control group, Personal Distress (PD) of the empathy subscale decreased significantly in the MBSR group (β=-3.55 [95%CI -5.09, -1.40], p<0.005). No other significant change was observed as for the empathy subscales. Students in the MBSR group increased their emotional skills as the ability to identify (p<.005, Cohen’s d=0,52) and understand (p=.02, Cohen’s d=0.62) one’s own emotion. The total Self-Compassion score (SCS) increased significantly in the MBSR group (β=-25.5 [95%CI 18.16, 32.86], p<0.001) assesses the ability to self-care. Conclusion: Results suggest that MBSR develops medical students' interpersonal resources and reduces empathy distress. Indeed, PD assesses the tendency to feel distress and discomfort in response to the distress of others and corresponds to a challenge in medical training. MBSR could be beneficially combined with other educational modalities to enhance each component of empathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicEmpathy and Medical Education→French-language works237,207→