MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296351945 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-f6jvp

Deoxygenative Suzuki-Miyaura Arylation of Tertiary Alcohols

2022· preprint· en· W4296351945 on OpenAlexafffund
Adam Cook, Piers St. Onge, Stephen G. Newman

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisPhenolYield (engineering)DerivatizationAlkylAlcoholStereocenterFunctional groupAllyl alcoholAlkylphenol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coupling of tertiary alcohols with boronic esters is described, providing a direct access to quaternary carbon scaffolds without needing to proceed by a highly activated intermediate such as an alkyl halide. A dual catalyst system is employed with both Ni(0) and Bi(III) components playing a critical role along with a mild chlorosilane reactant that enhances the yield by alcohol silylation. This method was found to tolerate diverse functional groups including chloro, nitro, olefin, ketone, ester and phenol moieties, while also being applicable to the derivatization of heterocyclic scaffolds. Mechanistic studies suggest the combination of Lewis acid catalyst and organosilane promote heterolytic cleavage of the substrate C–O bond by an SN1-like reaction pathway, providing a powerful strategy for derivatizing readily available alcohols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207