Successful medical management of an acute life‐threatening haemorrhagic crisis related to acquired colonic vascular ectasia in a dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A 7‐year‐old, neutered, male miniature pinscher was presented with a 36‐hour history of acute life‐threatening haematochezia and severe anaemia (haematocrit 4.9%). A diagnosis of acquired colonic vascular ectasia was ultimately made from the characteristic gross morphologic vascular abnormalities visualised during colonoscopy. A combination ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate tablet was prescribed. On recheck 6 weeks after starting hormone therapy, the patient had not had haematochezia for the previous 4 weeks (haematocrit 34%). On the recheck visit 12 months after starting hormone therapy, haematocrit was within reference range (50%) and the patient had not had diarrhoea or haematochezia for the preceding 9 months. This is the first case report describing a successful medical management of an acute haemorrhagic crisis related to acquired colonic vascular ectasia without endoscopic‐assisted argon therapy or colectomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".