Model Based Risk Assessment to Evaluate Lung Functionality for Early Prognosis of Asthma Using Neural Network Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predictive modeling of asthma characterized by the systematic use of Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques to develop classification/prediction models is a vital tool which is being deployed in most of the computer mediated decision making processes. Spirometry, being one of the most commonly used lung function tests, helps in the diagnosis and continuous monitoring of asthma and is recommended by both the national and international guidelines for the management of the disease when compared to other pulmonary function tests. It has been found to be more reliable because it has more parametric values. Despite the generalization of the respiratory equations in spirometry with respect of selected ethnic groups, the equation yields a considerable difference when compared to the spirometric readings in the general population. In an effort to overcome such differences that deviate from actual observations, in this paper, we have proposed a neural network model that can output a vector of Tiffeneau-Pinelli Index. The neural network model for the prediction of Tiffeneau-Pinelli index was able to reproduce a vector of indices that very closely approximated the actual observed values with a very low estimated error with an optimized radial basis fit neural net. This can be used as a reliable means to estimate some of the vital lung function parameters irrespective of the differences in the general population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it