Model Based Risk Assessment to Evaluate Lung Functionality for Early Prognosis of Asthma Using Neural Network Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predictive modeling of asthma characterized by the systematic use of Machine Learning and Deep Learning techniques to develop classification/prediction models is a vital tool which is being deployed in most of the computer mediated decision making processes. Spirometry, being one of the most commonly used lung function tests, helps in the diagnosis and continuous monitoring of asthma and is recommended by both the national and international guidelines for the management of the disease when compared to other pulmonary function tests. It has been found to be more reliable because it has more parametric values. Despite the generalization of the respiratory equations in spirometry with respect of selected ethnic groups, the equation yields a considerable difference when compared to the spirometric readings in the general population. In an effort to overcome such differences that deviate from actual observations, in this paper, we have proposed a neural network model that can output a vector of Tiffeneau-Pinelli Index. The neural network model for the prediction of Tiffeneau-Pinelli index was able to reproduce a vector of indices that very closely approximated the actual observed values with a very low estimated error with an optimized radial basis fit neural net. This can be used as a reliable means to estimate some of the vital lung function parameters irrespective of the differences in the general population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".