Regulation With Guaranteed Convergence Rate for Continuous-Time Systems With Completely Unknown Dynamics in the Presence of Disturbance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design of a novelH∞-based control framework for state regulation of continuous-time linear systems with completely unknown dynamics. The proposed method solves the regulation problem with the desired convergence rate and simultaneously seeks to attenuate the adverse effect of disturbance on the system. TheH∞regulation problem assumes a cost function that considers regulation with a guaranteed rate of convergence as well as disturbance attenuation. The problem is then turned into a two-player zero-sum game optimization problem that can be solved by solving the associated algebraic Riccati equation (ARE), which provides a model-based solution. To solve this problem in a model-free way, a novel integral reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithm is designed to learn the solution online without requiring any prior knowledge of the system dynamics. It is shown that the model-free method (i.e., IRL-based method) provides the same solution as the model-based method (i.e., ARE). The effectiveness of the proposed method is ascertained through simulation examples; it is shown that the proposed method effectively addresses the problem for both stable and unstable systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".