Funciones ejecutivas y bienestar psicológico en estudiantes de educación secundaria
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
he general objective of the research was to determine the relationship between executive functions and psychological well-being of first-year high school students from an educational institution in Callao. The study was carried out through an empirical, correlational-simple methodological design. The participants were 216 high school students from an educational institution in the Constitutional Province of Callao. The technique was the survey and the instruments were the EFECO questionnaire and psychological well-being scale (BIPSI). The results have shown that there is a significant relationship between executive functions and psychological well-being, concluding that executive functions are the cognitive capacities of the prefrontal cortex that allow self-regulatory behaviors, self-determine actions, socialize, develop a life purpose and have autonomy. In conclusion: there was a significant and direct relationship between executive functions and psychological well-being of first-year high school students from an educational institution in Callao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it