MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296498723 · doi:10.1093/pch/21.supp5.e81c

Serum Calcium Derangements in Neonates with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) With and Without Therapeutic Hypothermia

2016· article· en· W4296498723 on OpenAlexaff
RA Bashir, S Vayalthrikkovil, L Espinoza, K Mohammad

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcidosisHypothermiaEncephalopathyHypoxic Ischemic EncephalopathyPediatricsRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)AnesthesiaMetabolic acidosisInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Perinatal hypoxia is a recognized cause of hypocalcemia in neonates in the first 3 days of age. However, therapeutic hypothermia (TH), the standard care for moderate to severe HIE, promotes neuropro-tection by decreasing calcium (Ca) influx into the cells during reperfusion phase. So TH can increase serum Ca levels and may even negate the hypo-calcemic effects in HIE. OBJECTIVES: To examine the trends in serum Ca levels in neonates with HIE with and without TH. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of neonates with moderate to severe HIE admitted to a level III NICU between September 2011 and October 2015. HIE staging was done as per modified Sarnat’s scoring system. Hypercalcemia was defined as serum ionised Ca (iCa) >1.35 mmol/L and hypocalcemia was defined as serum iCa <0.9 mmol/L. Acidosis was considered if pH <7.2. Serum Ca and pH were followed in the first 3 days of age (Day 1-3). The relation of serum Ca levels with acidosis,seizures, intracranial hemorrhage, and MRI changes in neonates with and without TH was examined. Categorical variables were analysed using chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was done to explore the association of hypo/hypercalcemia with various variables, adjusting for TH, HIE staging, and acidosis. RESULTS: Total number of neonates with moderate-severe HIE= 113; 89 neonates (79%) underwent TH. Incidence of hypercalcemia was 57/89 (88%) in the TH group whereas only one-third in the no TH group, whereas for hypocalcemia, it was 11/89(12%) and 5/24(21%) for the TH and no TH groups respectively. Hypercalcemia on Day 1 was significantly higher with TH(p 0.007) and acidosis(p 0.015). Hypocalcemia did not have any such association. Hypo/hypercarbia did not seem to alter the serum Ca levels. There was no increase in intracranial hemorrhage, clinical/EEG seizures, antiepileptic drug use or hypoxic MRI changes with Ca derangements. CONCLUSION: Incidence of hypocalcemia was reduced by almost half in TH group. Hypercalcemia on day 1 was significantly associated with TH and acidosis. On days 2 and 3, hypercalcemia occurred in TH even in the absence of acidosis, but the association was not statistically significant. Less hypocalcemia and more hypercalcemia in TH may be attributed to the neuroprotective effect of TH by inhibiting Ca influx into the cells. However, there was no correlation between Ca derangements and seizures or severity of hypoxic changes in MRI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology→French-language works237,207→