MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296510833 · doi:10.4000/belphegor.4812

Denis Lapiere, Daniel Couvreur et Christian Durieux, Le faux Soir

2022· article· fr· W4296510833 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Víctor Rodríguez Infiesta

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterary Analysis and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La historia del « faux Soir » sigue siendo conocida con más o menos detalles por no pocos belgas, pese al tiempo transcurrido desde noviembre de 1943 y la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Es un caso interesante de la pervivencia en la memoria colectiva de un hecho histórico cuyo eco resuena en manifestaciones culturales de distinta naturaleza. Un poema perdido en el tiempo (« Je viens de lire un bout du Soir, / Dont s’amuse toute la ville »... ); un film de los años cincuenta, que deja una huella much...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicLiterary Analysis and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207