MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning for Explainable Estimation of Mortality Risk From Myocardial Positron Emission Tomography Images

2022· article· en· W4296514530 on OpenAlexaff
Ananya Singh, Jacek Kwieciński, Robert J.H. Miller, Yuka Otaki, Paul Kavanagh, Serge D. Van Kriekinge, Tejas Parekh, Heidi Gransar, Konrad Pieszko, Aditya Killekar, Ramyashree Tummala, Joanna X. Liang, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Daniel S. Berman, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Imaging · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineQuartilePositron emission tomographyMyocardial perfusion imagingProspective cohort studyCardiologyInternal medicineLogistic regressionPerfusionReceiver operating characteristicPerfusion scanningArea under the curveMyocardial infarctionNuclear medicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We aim to develop an explainable deep learning (DL) network for the prediction of all-cause mortality directly from positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging flow and perfusion polar map data and evaluate it using prospective testing. Methods: A total of 4735 consecutive patients referred for stress and rest 82 Rb positron emission tomography between 2010 and 2018 were followed up for all-cause mortality for 4.15 (2.24–6.3) years. DL network utilized polar maps of stress and rest perfusion, myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and spill-over fraction combined with cardiac volumes, singular indices, and sex. Patients scanned from 2010 to 2016 were used for training and validation. The network was tested in a set of 1135 patients scanned from 2017 to 2018 to simulate prospective clinical implementation. Results: In prospective testing, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for all-cause mortality prediction by DL (0.82 [95% CI, 0.77–0.86]) was higher than ischemia (0.60 [95% CI, 0.54–0.66]; P <0.001), myocardial flow reserve (0.70 [95% CI, 0.64–0.76], P <0.001) or a comprehensive logistic regression model (0.75 [95% CI, 0.69–0.80], P <0.05). The highest quartile of patients by DL had an annual all-cause mortality rate of 11.87% and had a 16.8 ([95% CI, 6.12%–46.3%]; P <0.001)-fold increase in the risk of death compared with the lowest quartile patients. DL showed a 21.6% overall reclassification improvement as compared with established measures of ischemia. Conclusions: The DL model trained directly on polar maps allows improved patient risk stratification in comparison with established methods for positron emission tomography flow or perfusion assessments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207