MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296520156 · doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117959

Statistically accurate discrete phase modelling of particle cloud generation using Aggregate Steady Random Particle injection

2022· article· en· W4296520156 on OpenAlexaff
Mark J. Parker, Eric Savory, Anthony G. Straatman

Bibliographic record

VenuePowder Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsMechanicsTransient (computer programming)Particle (ecology)SimulationCFD-DEMAggregate (composite)Computer sciencePhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach called Aggregate STEady Random Particle (A-STERP) injection is introduced to characterize the injection of a random particle cloud into a continuous phase using existing discrete phase modelling (DPM). A-STERP takes advantage of the short computational time of steady DPM simulations and introduces temporal randomization by considering the aggregate, cumulative average of results obtained from sequential steady simulations using files of randomized injection points and particle sizes. A-STERP is shown by computational validation to converge to a steady value of, for example, total collection efficiency in a particle separation device, with increased numbers of randomized injection locations and numbers of injection files. A-STERP works within the framework of existing CFD software and was validated by computational modelling using ANSYS FLUENT of a generic collection chamber, a baffled pre-separator, and a cyclone for its ability to predict total collection efficiency and fractional collection efficiency of a defined distribution of particles. The results yielded by A-STERP were compared to those obtained from a randomized transient injection method and shown in all cases to be just as accurate, while requiring only a small fraction of the computational time – seconds/min compared to hours/days. The application of A-STERP is shown to provide accurate results for both stationary and time-periodic flows, and, by extension, to non-stationary flows. To this end, A-STERP makes it practical to conduct accurate DPM calculations of particle injection in large-scale simulations of complex devices, something that is not always practical using randomized transient DPM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePowder TechnologySame topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207