MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296579883 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2021-0042

Logic design method and optimization of hydraulic system for heavy-duty automatic transmission

2022· article· en· W4296579883 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huaichao Wu, Yong Gang Dong, Gang Cao, Limei Zhao, Yang Lv

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHydraulic machineryTransmission systemTransmission (telecommunications)ClutchTorqueGenetic algorithmRange (aeronautics)EngineeringControl logicControl engineeringHydraulic fluidPressure controlComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the shifting control hydraulic system of the heavy-duty automatic transmission was designed, aiming to unify and standardize design methods. The said system was designed according to the binary logic characteristics of hydraulic components. In addition, to meet the torque transmission requirements and reduce the energy consumption, both the oil pressure supply and flow-regulating system were designed. Mathematical and simulation models of the hydraulic system were established to analyze its performance. Finally, the genetic algorithm was used to optimize the system (within the AMESim environment); the results have shown that the main pressure of each gear was controlled in a reasonable range, and both the pressure of shift clutch and the pressure response time were reduced. In addition, the power loss of the hydraulic system was significantly improved, which improved the practical performance of the overall hydraulic system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207