Mise en incapacité professionnelle pour contrôler l'accès à la terre agricole : Enquête à Piton l'Ermitage, Saint-Paul (La Réunion) chapitre 3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
/ À partir de contributions d'horizons disciplinaires variés, l'ouvrage se donne pour objectif d'éclairer la variété des modes de gouvernement de la nature et les dilemmes de la gestion et de la protection de ses ressources, en France et au Québec. Examinant à la fois l'économie comme impératif du développement territorial, la fabrique sociale des problèmes et des risques environnementaux et sanitaires, la dialectique entre participation et négociations dans l'action environnementale et les inégalités et sentiments de justice qu'elle suscite, l'ouvrage propose de penser le gouvernement des ressources naturelles et ses voies de transition. Même si l'ouvrage ne se présente pas comme un manuel des « bonnes pratiques » en matière de protection de la nature, il souhaite faire réfléchir un large public de chercheurs, d'étudiants, de professionnels et de citoyens aux exigences sociales de protection de la nature et des ses ressources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".