MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296620006 · doi:10.1093/jas/skac247.142

162 Differential Late Gestation Metabolizable Energy Intake Alters Adipose-Specific Insulin Responsiveness in Antepartum Beef Cattle

2022· article· en· W4296620006 on OpenAlexaff
Koryn S Hare, Emily Croft, G.B. Penner, Katharine M Wood, M.A. Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNEFAInternal medicineEndocrinologyInsulinBeef cattleAnimal scienceGestationChemistryBiologyMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We evaluated how metabolizable energy (ME) intake influences antepartum insulin sensitivity in beef cattle. Angus-Simmental cattle (primiparous: n = 17; multiparous: n = 21) were randomly assigned to treatments supplying 80 (LowME, n = 19) or 120% (HighME, n = 19) of predicted ME requirements for 53 d prepartum. At 7 d antepartum, intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTT) were imposed by infusing 1.36 g glucose/kg BW0.75 and sampling from -3 to 90 min to measure plasma glucose and insulin and serum non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) concentrations. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with the fixed effects of treatment, parity, time (repeated), and treatment×time and considering cow(treatment) as random. Baseline glucose concentration increased (P = 0.03) and baseline insulin concentration tended to increase (P = 0.06) for HighME relative to LowME cattle irrespective (P ≥ 0.33) of parity, whereas baseline NEFA concentration was elevated (P < 0.01) for LowME vs. HighME. Plasma glucose-insulin concentrations during the IVGTT did not differ (P ≥ 0.25) by treatment, treatment×time, or parity. However, serum NEFA was elevated (P < 0.01) throughout the IVGTT for LowME vs. HighME cattle and tended to be affected (P = 0.09) by the treatment×time interaction as NEFA concentrations became similar at 90 min due to HighME cattle having a shallower (treatment×time: P < 0.01) decremental NEFA response than LowME cattle. Low ME cattle cleared NEFA more quickly (75% increase; P < 0.01) than HighME. The glucose positive incremental area-under-the-curve throughout the IVGTT tended to be lesser (P = 0.06) for heifers than cows but heifers had a blunted (P ≤ 0.05) glucose-stimulated reduction in NEFA and NEFA clearance rate compared to cows. These data demonstrate that ME provision may alter adipose insulin responsiveness in antepartum beef cattle and that heifers respond to excess glucose and NEFA differently than cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicReproductive Physiology in Livestock→French-language works237,207→