MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296630931 · doi:10.1093/jas/skac247.226

268 Effect of Functional Amino Acid Supplementation in low and Normal Birth Weight Pigs on Performance and Immune Status During Subsequent Salmonella Challenge

2022· article· en· W4296630931 on OpenAlexaff
Lucas Alves Rodrigues, Josiane C Panisson, Agbee L Kpogo, John K Htoo, Andrew G. Van Kessel, Daniel A Columbus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanGenome Prairie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeaningAnimal scienceFecesSalmonellaInoculationBiologyBirth weightMedicinePregnancyImmunologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Functional amino acid (FAA) supplementation improves growth performance and immune status of weaned pigs. The objective was to determine the effects of birth weight and FAA supplementation in the post-weaning period on the response of pigs to a subsequent Salmonella (ST) challenge. Thirty-two low (1.09±0.11 kg; LBW) and normal birth weight (1.58±0.11 kg; NBW) pigs were assigned to a nursery feeding program for 4 wk in a 2 × 2 factorial with factors of birth weight category (LBW vs. NBW) and basal (FAA–) or supplemented FAA profile (FAA+; Thr, Met, and Trp at 120% of requirements). Pigs were then placed onto a grower diet and, after a 7-d adaptation period, were inoculated with ST (2.2 × 109 CFU/mL) and monitored for 7 d post-inoculation. Growth performance, rectal temperature, gut health, ST fecal shedding and translocation, and blood parameters were measured pre- and post-inoculation. Inoculation with ST increased rectal temperature (39.7 vs. 38.9±0.5 oC) and overall rectal temperature was higher in LBW compared with NBW pigs (39.6 vs. 39.0±0.5 oC; P< 0.05). Salmonella shedding (1.8 vs. 2.3±0.1 score) and translocation to spleen (1.3 vs. 2.5±0.1 score) were less in NBW-FAA+ than NBW-FAA- pigs (P< 0.05). Post-inoculation weight gain was greater in NBW-FAA+ compared with the other groups (0.57 vs. 0.45±0.03 kg/d; P< 0.05). Post-inoculation haptoglobin (d 4; 1.0 vs. 0.7±0.1 g/L) and colonic myeloperoxidase (d 7; 4.3 vs. 2.5±0.6 µU/mL) were greater in LBW-FAA- pigs compared with the other groups (P< 0.05). On d 4 post-inoculation, plasma superoxide dismutase was less in LBW- FAA+ than in LBW-FAA- (60.5 vs. 93.3±7.7 mU/mL; P< 0.05). Reduced:oxidized glutathione at d 7 post-inoculation was greater in NBW compared with LBW pigs (2.5 vs. 1.7±0.3; P< 0.05). In conclusion, negative effects of Salmonella infection are ameliorated with supplementation of FAA to a greater extent in NBW than in LBW pigs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→