MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296637117 · doi:10.1093/jas/skac247.685

PSV-B-20 Effect of Physically Effective Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Undigested Neutral Detergent Fiber on Eating Behavior, Ruminal pH, Ruminal Motility, and Total Tract Permeability for Finishing Cattle

2022· article· en· W4296637117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutral Detergent FiberLatin squareDry matterAnimal scienceChemistryStrawTotal mixed rationMealRumenFood scienceBiologyAgronomyFermentationLactation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study evaluated the effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), and undigested neutral detergent fiber (uNDF) on dry matter intake (DMI), eating behavior, ruminal fermentation, and total tract permeability for finishing cattle. Simmental heifers (n=6; 667.8±28.4 kg) were used in a replicated 3×3 Latin square (21-d periods) balanced for carry-over effects. Barley grain-based diets were formulated to provide treatments with: low peNDF and low uNDF (95% barley and supplement, and 0% straw; 0FOR); low peNDF but high uNDF (85% barley and supplement, 10% pelleted straw; PEL); or high peNDF with high uNDF (85% barley and supplement, 10% chopped straw; ST). Treatment did not affect DMI (P=0.93). Heifers fed 0FOR spent less (P< 0.01) time eating vs. ST, where PEL was intermediate. Time spent ruminating was greater (P=0.01) for ST than 0FOR, with PEL not differing. Heifers fed 0FOR had fewer meals/d than ST (P< 0.01) and meal size was greater for 0FOR than PEL and ST (P< 0.01). Feeding 0FOR reduced (P=0.02) mean ruminal pH (5.65 vs. 6.07) and increased (522 vs. 288 min/d, P=0.02) the duration that pH was < 5.5 relative to ST with PEL being intermediate (5.82 and 504 min/d, respectively). Heifers fed 0FOR had greater (112.5 vs. 59.9 sec, P=0.05) time between contractions and lesser (61.45 vs. 94.58 mmHg′sec, P=0.05) contraction area compared with cattle fed ST, while PEL remained intermediate (76.73 sec and 73.29 mmHg×sec, respectively). Permeability of the gastrointestinal tract to Cr-EDTA and intestine to Co-EDTA did not differ (P≥0.11) among treatments. The data suggest that increasing uNDF improved ruminal function, but increasing uNDF with peNDF is needed to decrease the risk of ruminal acidosis in finishing cattle. The results further suggest that the use of uNDF and peNDF may provide useful information over NDF inclusion when evaluating fiber adequacy of finishing diets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it