MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296642782 · doi:10.1002/trc2.12348

Chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae of SARS‐CoV‐2: Protocol and methods from the Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium

2022· article· en· W4296642782 on OpenAlexaff
Gabriel A. de Erausquin, Heather M. Snyder, Traolach Brugha, Sudha Seshadri, María C. Carrillo, Rajesh Sagar, Yueqin Huang, Charles R. Newton, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Krister Håkanson, Rufus Akinyemi, Kameshwar Prasad, Giovanni d’Avossa, Gabriela Gonzalez‐Alemán, Akram A. Hosseini, George D. Vavougios, Perminder S. Sachdev, John Bankart, Niels Peter Ole Mors, Richard Lipton, Mindy J. Katz, Peter T. Fox, Mohammad Zia Ul Haq Katshu, M. Sriram Iyengar, Galit Weinstein, Hamid R. Sohrabi, Rachel Jenkins, Dan J. Stein, Jacques Hugon, Venetsanos Mavreas, John Blangero, Carlos Cruchaga, Murali Krishna, Ovais Wadoo, Rodrigo Becerra, Igor Zwir, W.T. Longstreth, Golo Kroenenberg, Paul Edison, Elizabeta B. Mukaetova‐Ladinska, Ekkehart Staufenberg, Mariana Figueredo‐Aguiar, Agustín Yécora, Fabiana Vaca, Hernan P. Zamponi, Vincenzina Lo Re, Abdul Majid, Jonas S. Sundarakumar, Héctor M. González, Mirjam I. Geerlings, Ingmar Skoog, Alberto Salmoiraghi, Filippo Martinelli Boneschi, Vibuthi N. Patel, Juan M. Santos, Guillermo Rivera Arroyo, Antonio Caballero Moreno, Pascal Felix, Carla Gallo, Hidenori Arai, Masahito Yamada, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Malveeka Sharma, Nandini Chakraborty, Catterina Ferreccio, Dickens Akena, Carol Brayne, Gladys E. Maestre, Sarah Williams Blangero, Luis Ignacio Brusco, Prabha Siddarth, Timothy M. Hughes, Alfredo Ramírez Zuñiga, Joseph Kambeitz, Norrina B. Allen, Stella E. Panos, David A. Merrill, Agustín Ibáñez, Debby W. Tsuang, Nino Valishvili, Srishti Shrestha, Sophia Wang, Vasantha Padma, Kaarin J. Anstey, Vijayalakshmi Ravindrdanath, Kaj Blennow, Paul G. Mullins, Emilia Łojek, Pria Anand, Thomas H. Mosley, Penny Gowland, Timothy D. Girard, Richard Bowtell, Farhaan Vahidy

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilNational Institute on AgingUniversity of Cape TownUniversity of LeicesterWorld Health OrganizationUniversity of HaifaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Human Genome Research InstituteIndian Institute of Science
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineDiseaseAsymptomaticCerebral amyloid angiopathyDementiaEpidemiologyStroke (engine)PsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused >3.5 million deaths worldwide and affected >160 million people. At least twice as many have been infected but remained asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. COVID-19 includes central nervous system manifestations mediated by inflammation and cerebrovascular, anoxic, and/or viral neurotoxicity mechanisms. More than one third of patients with COVID-19 develop neurologic problems during the acute phase of the illness, including loss of sense of smell or taste, seizures, and stroke. Damage or functional changes to the brain may result in chronic sequelae. The risk of incident cognitive and neuropsychiatric complications appears independent from the severity of the original pulmonary illness. It behooves the scientific and medical community to attempt to understand the molecular and/or systemic factors linking COVID-19 to neurologic illness, both short and long term. Methods: This article describes what is known so far in terms of links among COVID-19, the brain, neurological symptoms, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. We focus on risk factors and possible molecular, inflammatory, and viral mechanisms underlying neurological injury. We also provide a comprehensive description of the Alzheimer's Association Consortium on Chronic Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (CNS SC2) harmonized methodology to address these questions using a worldwide network of researchers and institutions. Results: Successful harmonization of designs and methods was achieved through a consensus process initially fragmented by specific interest groups (epidemiology, clinical assessments, cognitive evaluation, biomarkers, and neuroimaging). Conclusions from subcommittees were presented to the whole group and discussed extensively. Presently data collection is ongoing at 19 sites in 12 countries representing Asia, Africa, the Americas, and Europe. Discussion: The Alzheimer's Association Global Consortium harmonized methodology is proposed as a model to study long-term neurocognitive sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Key Points: The following review describes what is known so far in terms of molecular and epidemiological links among COVID-19, the brain, neurological symptoms, and AD and related dementias (ADRD)The primary objective of this large-scale collaboration is to clarify the pathogenesis of ADRD and to advance our understanding of the impact of a neurotropic virus on the long-term risk of cognitive decline and other CNS sequelae. No available evidence supports the notion that cognitive impairment after SARS-CoV-2 infection is a form of dementia (ADRD or otherwise). The longitudinal methodologies espoused by the consortium are intended to provide data to answer this question as clearly as possible controlling for possible confounders. Our specific hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2 triggers ADRD-like pathology following the extended olfactory cortical network (EOCN) in older individuals with specific genetic susceptibility.The proposed harmonization strategies and flexible study designs offer the possibility to include large samples of under-represented racial and ethnic groups, creating a rich set of harmonized cohorts for future studies of the pathophysiology, determinants, long-term consequences, and trends in cognitive aging, ADRD, and vascular disease.We provide a framework for current and future studies to be carried out within the Consortium. and offers a "green paper" to the research community with a very broad, global base of support, on tools suitable for low- and middle-income countries aimed to compare and combine future longitudinal data on the topic.The Consortium proposes a combination of design and statistical methods as a means of approaching causal inference of the COVID-19 neuropsychiatric sequelae. We expect that deep phenotyping of neuropsychiatric sequelae may provide a series of candidate syndromes with phenomenological and biological characterization that can be further explored. By generating high-quality harmonized data across sites we aim to capture both descriptive and, where possible, causal associations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.262
GPT teacher head0.569
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical InterventionsSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207