Anxiolytic Herbs and Naturopathic Treatment of Anxiety-Induced Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on successful treatment of female sexual dysfunction in a young (23-year-old) woman (she/her) with a combination of anxiolytic and stress-relieving natural health products (NHPs) together with patient education and lifestyle counselling. Presenting symptoms included decreased sexual desire and arousal, anorgasmia, dyspareunia, and vaginismus that had improved with pelvic physiotherapy prior to the onset of naturopathic treatment. Contributing factors in this case included a personal history of abuse and sexual trauma. Alongside counseling and patient education, NHPs initially included L-theanine, Rhodiola rosea, Panax ginseng, and vitamin D. Over approximately 4 months of treatment, the patient reported significant improvements in sexual desire, both physical and psychological arousal, and was able to achieve orgasm. This case report identifies the important role of mental health and stress in female sexual dysfunction and supports the use of natural anxiolytics to support sexual function, in particular in patients with a history of trauma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".