MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296694177 · doi:10.1364/up.2022.w4a.13

A Time-Domain Perspective of Quantum Electro-Optic Sampling

2022· article· en· W4296694177 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Virally, Patrick Cusson, Denis V. Seletskiy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena (UP) 2022 · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Sampling (signal processing)Time domainQuantumDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceQuadrature (astronomy)DetectorPhysicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsTelecommunicationsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of a fully time-domain perspective of electro-optic sampling provides insights into the geometry of the time-domain detector and outlines possible ways for quadrature sampling of quantum fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena (UP) 2022Same topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207