MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296710429 · doi:10.1136/jitc-2022-itoc9.27

P02.08 The role of the inflammasome in the spatiotemporal evolution of the immune cell landscape in post-resection glioblastoma

2022· article· en· W4296710429 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastian Lillo, D Chalopin, M Derieppe, J. Martineau, J Giraud, A Le Dantec, O Mollier, M Nikolski, T Daubon, M Saleh

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemParenchymaGliomaTumor microenvironmentCancer researchRadiation therapyMedicineInflammasomeBiologyInflammationImmunologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Glioblastomas (GB) are the most severe and deadliest brain tumors in adults. Survival is estimated &lt; 15 months after diagnosis and with a relapse rate &gt; 95%. The current standard-of-care involves surgery, when possible, and radiotherapy coupled with chemotherapy. Two characteristics might underlie the high relapse rate in GB: 1) the infiltrative capacity of tumor cells that spread out of the hypoxic and acidic tumor core, and 2) the unique composition of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) that is sparce in T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells but dominated by glioma-associated macrophages (GAMs). Although surgery is a standard treatment in GB, it fails to remove infiltrative tumor cells and causes an inflammatory and immunosuppressive trauma that might promote GB recurrence by altering the TME. However, the post-resection diversity of immune cells in GB and the pathways that determine their functions in primary growth versus post-resection recurrence remain largely unknown. In this project, we characterize the immune landscape of GB before and after surgical resection and explore the role of the inflammasome in its dynamics and regulation. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> GL261-GFP-GLuc mesenchymal-type GB cells were orthotopically injected in WT or inflammasome-deficient(<i>Ice<sup>-/-</sup></i>) mice. On day 18 post-implantation, tumors and adjacent parenchyma tissue were collected from the unresected group (group 1). In parallel, tumor resection was performed on a second group of mice (group 2). 10 days later, tumors and adjacent parenchyma tissue were collected from group 2. Following tissue dissociation, immune cells were FACS-sorted from GB tumor-bearing mouse brains. Sorted immune cells were multiplexed using barcoaded lipid indices into 6 different pools and ScRNAseq (10x Genomics) was performed. For the scRNAseq, 30,000 cells/pool, corresponding to 7,500 viable cells/sample were loaded on the 10x chip. <h3>Results</h3> Following putative doublet removal and exclusion of stressed or dead cells, we analysed the transcriptomes of ~61,000 single immune cells. Following data integration with Seurat, community detection, non-linear dimension reduction and graph clustering, 23 Louvain clusters were identified, including 15 from the myeloid lineage and 8 from the lymphoid lineage. we observed a significant depletion of microglia (MG)/MG-TAM from the tumor compared to the adjacent non-tumoral parenchyma, which was accompanied by a significant influx of bone-marrow-derived (BM)-TAM and monocytes as already known. Little differences were observed between WT or <i>Ice<sup>-/-</sup></i>mice before resection. However, post-resection remodelling of the GB TME was regulated by the inflammasome. Notably, monocytes, dendritic cells and regulatory T cells (Treg) subsets increased post resection in the adjacent non-tumoral tissue in WT but not <i>Ice<sup>-/-</sup></i>mice. Similarly, the intra-tumoral influx of Treg and the compositional changes of BM-TAMs observed in WT mice were blunted in inflammasome-deficient conditions. These TME differences correlated with faster tumor regrowth and decreased survival rates in WT mice compared to inflammasome-deficient mice. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our data reveal a significant impact of GB resection on TME remodeling and implicate the inflammasome in post-resection recurrence. <h3>Disclosure Information</h3> <b>S. Lillo:</b> None. <b>D. Chalopin:</b> None. <b>M. Derieppe:</b> None. <b>J. Martineau:</b> None. <b>J. Giraud:</b> None. <b>A. Le Dantec:</b> None. <b>O. Mollier:</b> None. <b>M. Nikolski:</b> None. <b>T. Daubon:</b> None. <b>M. Saleh:</b> None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207