MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296715233 · doi:10.18280/mmep.090416

Differential Sandwich Theorems Involving Linear Operator

2022· article· en· W4296715233 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thamer Khalil MS. Al-Khafaji, Asmaa KH. Abdul-Rahman, Lieth A. Majed

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubordination (linguistics)MathematicsDifferential (mechanical device)Differential operatorHadamard productAnalytic functionOperator (biology)Linear mapHadamard transformPure mathematicsProduct (mathematics)Mathematical analysisPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current study is fully devoted to studying differential subordination and superordination theorems of analytic functions with some sandwich results involving linear operators Iλs,a,μ. This operator was obtained by the Hadamard product with the family of integral operators and the Hurwitlz-Lerch Zeta function. The current results demonstrate the possibility and capability of extracting the Sandwich theorem, and the conclusion includes differential subordination and differential superordination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAnalytic and geometric function theoryFrench-language works237,207