MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296737198 · doi:10.1364/cosi.2022.jw4c.2

Comparison of Numerical Spectral Alignment Methods in Dual-spectrometer SD-OCT System

2022· article· en· W4296737198 on OpenAlexaff
Yusi Miao, Jun Song, Myeong Jin Ju

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging and Applied Optics Congress 2022 (3D, AOA, COSI, ISA, pcAOP) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectrometerImaging spectrometerCalibrationDual (grammatical number)OpticsContrast (vision)Spectral imagingPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To correctly implement the dual-spectrometer SD-OCT, two numerical calibration methods are demonstrated that effectively compensate for the spectral misalignment between spectrometers. Significant improvements in the image contrast are observed through retinal imaging after spectral calibration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaging and Applied Optics Congress 2022 (3D, AOA, COSI, ISA, pcAOP)Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207