MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296750403

Literature Review on Background Subtraction Model for Object Detection

2021· preprint· en· W4296750403 on OpenAlexaff
Jaskirat Singh, Sandeep Kumar Sahoo

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackground subtractionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceObject (grammar)SubtractionObject detectionComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsPixelArithmetic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background subtraction is widely used technique in computer vision application for object detection and segmentation. Most of the work done on background subtraction considers static camera that identify moving objects by detecting areas in a video that change over time, which is not applicable in real world scenarios like moving camera mounted on the autonomous vehicle.it's a difficult problem due to the motion of both camera and the object.In this paper, we extend the concept of subtracting areas at rest to apply to video captured from a freely moving camera. we approach this problem by exploiting optical flow based background subtraction method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207