Prise de conscience patrimoniale d’un héritage naturel et culturel commun : les terres des Sœurs de la Charité, à Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La révision participative du Schéma d’aménagement et de développement de l’Agglomération du Québec suscite un trouble, une indignation en ce qu’elle pourrait mener au dézonage de terres agricoles périurbaines dotées d’un ensemble de propriétés, de valeurs partagées et reconnues par une communauté qui se mobilise pour en assurer collectivement la reconnaissance au titre de patrimoine commun et les préserver d’une transformation préjudiciable. Prenant appui sur les outils sociologiques développés par Luc Boltanski et Laurent Thévenot (1991), cette recherche analyse les opérations de dévoilement et de justification, les sens du bien et du juste ainsi que les appuis normatifs convoqués par les acteurs lorsqu’ils déterminent ce qui compte, ce à quoi ils attribuent une valeur, lorsqu’ils élaborent leur propre définition du monde et des actions qu’ils entendent y engager.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".