MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296770654 · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.030

Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers

2022· article· en· W4296770654 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah Copeland, Ivan Kneževič, David A. Baran, Vivek Rao, Michael Pham, Finn Gustafsson, Sean Pinney, Brian Lima, Marco Masetti, Agnieszka Ciarka, Navin Rajagopalan, Adriana Torres, Eileen Hsich, J. Patel, Lívia Adams Goldraich, Monica Colvin, Javier Segovia, Heather J. Ross, Mahazarin Ginwalla, Babak Sharif-Kashani, Maryjane Farr, Luciano Potena, Jon Kobashigawa, María G. Crespo‐Leiro, Natasha Altman, Florian Wagner, Jennifer Cook, Valentina Stosor, Paolo Grossi, Kiran K. Khush, Tahir Yağdı, Susan Restaino, Steven Tsui, Daniel Absi, George Sokos, Andreas Zuckermann, Brian Wayda, Joost Felius, Shelley Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersAbbott VascularNational Institutes of HealthAstellas PharmaAbiomedNateraNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteVifor PharmaCareDxPfizerLivaNovaBoston Scientific CorporationTherakosAlexion PharmaceuticalsAlnylam PharmaceuticalsAtara BiotherapeuticsGilead SciencesSanofiAmgenAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)MedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.042
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.133
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0420.133
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0170.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations129
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207