MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4296777338 · doi:10.1063/5.0117895

On rationality of C-graded vertex algebras and applications to Weyl vertex algebras under conformal flow

2022· article· en· W4296777338 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Katrina Barron, Karina Batistelli, Florencia Orosz Hunziker, Veronika Pedić Tomić, Gaywalee Yamskulna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoEuropean Regional Development FundBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoveryIllinois State University
KeywordsMathematicsVertex (graph theory)Lie conformal algebraVertex operator algebraPure mathematicsConformal mapParameterized complexityCurrent algebraInteger (computer science)Algebra over a fieldJordan algebraCombinatoricsMathematical analysisGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the Zhu algebra for a certain category of C-graded vertex algebras V, we prove that if V is finitely Ω-generated and satisfies suitable grading conditions, then V is rational, i.e., it has semi-simple representation theory, with a one-dimensional level zero Zhu algebra. Here, Ω denotes the vectors in V that are annihilated by lowering the real part of the grading. We apply our result to the family of rank one Weyl vertex algebras with conformal element ωμ parameterized by μ∈C and prove that for certain non-integer values of μ, these vertex algebras, which are non-integer graded, are rational, with a one-dimensional level zero Zhu algebra. In addition, we generalize this result to appropriate C-graded Weyl vertex algebras of arbitrary ranks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207