MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296781887 · doi:10.1093/pch/21.supp5.e56b

Improving Transition Practices: Understanding Family Experiences and Needs in Transitioning Their Child to Developmental/Rehabilitation Services

2016· article· en· W4296781887 on OpenAlexaff
M Ballantyne, A Sozer, T Orava, S Bernardo, A McPherson, P Church, D Fehlings, Éric A. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingThematic analysisNeonatal intensive care unitPopulationMedicineCerebral palsyQualitative researchHealth careNursingRehabilitationPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyFamily medicinePediatricsPsychiatrySocial psychologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Children born preterm (<37 weeks) with cerebral palsy (CP) have long-term complex medical needs that require transitions between multiple healthcare services, necessitating parental support. The experiences of parents undergoing early transitions from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to neonatal follow-up clinics (NFUC) to home are well-documented. Our prior research conducted found parents described positive transitions as: access to information, feeling involved in care and witnessing improvement in their child’s health outcomes post-transition. Negative experiences entail: unanticipated differences between healthcare services, feeling separated from their child and having inadequate information. Unfortunately, the next transition from children with CP born preterm (<37 weeks) to developmental/rehabilitation services (DRS) is grossly under-studied and knowledge from well-studied healthcare transitions has yet to be applied to this population. OBJECTIVES: To identify and describe the experience and needs of parents of children with CP born preterm, as they transition from NFUC to DRS. Additionally, to make recommendations building upon characteristics of supportive/positive transition experiences to meet the emotional, informational, and instrumental needs of parents during transition to DRS. DESIGN/METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted recruiting English-speaking parents of children born preterm with CP that required NICU hospitalization, and DRS post CP diagnosis. Purposeful and maximum variation strategies were used to recruit a sample of 15 parents. To ensure rigor, sampling continued until data saturation was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded using NVivo 10 software and underwent thematic analysis. Data collection and analyses were performed concurrently, with themes from early interviews incorporated, collapsed and used to inform later interviews. RESULTS: A majority of participants were mothers, whose child had received DRS for the past one to 12 years. Preliminary themes iterated by parents’ transition experiences included: Poor communication of diagnosis caused anxiety surrounding transition of care; a lack of timely access to appropriate care and resources negatively affected parents’ experiences; continuity and consistency of healthcare providers improved families’ perception of accessibility to care; and social support was desired throughout the transition period. CONCLUSION: The transition between NFUC and DRS for families with CP is significant, but lacks best practice research to advise care. Preliminary recommendations derived from data reveal the need to better support families earlier on in the transition process, beginning at the NFUC. Further research is required to identify best practices to strengthen communication, family involvement, continuity of care, and timely access to informational supports for parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicInfant Development and Preterm Care→French-language works237,207→