MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4296781916 · doi:10.1093/pch/21.supp5.e85

Antenatal, Perinatal and Neonatal Factors Associated with Periventricular White Matter Injury in Very Preterm Infants

2016· article· en· W4296781916 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S Ghotra, M Vincer, V Allen, N Khan, S Kuhle

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorencephalyPeriventricular leukomalaciaCerebral palsyGestational ageRetrospective cohort studyCohortCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although survival outcome in preterm infants has reached nearly 90%, long-term motor and cognitive disability and cerebral palsy in survivors remain an important concern. Periventricular white matter injury (WMI) is the major form of brain injury underlying these neurological morbidities. Cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL) and porencephaly contribute significantly to poor long-term neurodevelopmen-tal outcomes. Currently, there is no definitive therapy available to treat cPVL or porencephaly. The management mainly lies in identification of associated risk factors and their prevention. Most studies on risk factors of cPVL are limited in their retrospective case-control design and sample size, and have an inherent selection bias with the use of hospital-based data. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for cPVL and porencephaly in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants. DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted at the at the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, using data derived from the provincial Perinatal Follow-Up Program (PFUP) database. The PFUP database contains patient data for all pre-term infants born at a gestational age (GA) of <31 weeks in Nova Scotia since 1993. Infants born at 22 to 30 weeks from 1993 to 2013 (21 years) were included in the study. Infants with severe congenital malformations or chromosomal anomalies or who died in the first 6 weeks of life were excluded. Information on potential risk factors (divided into 3 groups: antenatal, perinatal and neonatal) as well as the presence or absence of cPVL and porencephaly diagnosed by cranial ultrasound at 6 weeks of age were extracted. Variables with a P value of < 0.20 in the univariate analysis were entered in the multivariate model using a backwards selection procedure. RESULTS: Of 1184 infants found eligible for the study, 87 (7.4%) had cPVL or porencephaly. Mean GA and birth weight were 27.9 weeks and 1133 g, respectively. The gestational age-adjusted prevalence of cPVL or porencephaly did not decrease over time (p=0.07). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, chorioamniotis (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.3), antenatal steroids (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.61), admission hypothermia (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9), ventilator support (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.4-16.9), and non-coagulase negative staphylococcal (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9) and fungal (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4-18.6) infections were independently associated with cPVL or porencephaly in the final model. CONCLUSION: This population-based cohort study has identified a number of clinically relevant factors associated with cPVL or porenceph-aly in very preterm infants. The findings have important implications in the delivery of perinatal and neonatal care to reduce the incidence of WMI and consequent, neurological morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology→French-language works237,207→