Coronary artery occlusion flap: An unusual case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old female presented with chest pain, shortness of breath, and was diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiogram revealed left main coronary artery (LMCA) spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Following conservative treatment, the patient continued experiencing shortness of breath and chest pain. The cause of these symptoms was difficult to ascertain, even with further investigation. The patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, and aortic root replacement with reimplantation of coronary buttons. Following aortotomy, a dissection flap formed by the SCAD was identified, intermittently occluding the LMCA. This was thought to cause their intermittent and severe heart failure symptoms as the flap would intermittently occlude the LMCA causing severe myocardial ischemia. CONCLUSION: This patient's presentation of a dissection flap intermittently occluding the LMCA demonstrates an abnormal manifestation of SCAD. Increased awareness of this presentation is imperative to ensure future cases are correctly identified and managed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".