MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Liberties of the Land: Preserving the Commons in England in the Later Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries

2022· book-chapter· en· W4296839023 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ben Cowell

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamineIrishPoorhouseLandlordLawHistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)House of CommonsCommonsEconomic shortageAcrePoor lawEstatePolitical scienceEconomic historyArchaeologyPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the course of the proceedings of the British House of Commons on 29 March 1847, William Gregory (1816–92), a county Galway landowner and MP for Dublin, proposed a clause to the Irish Poor Law Bill then under discussion as a means of alleviating the distress caused by the onset of Famine. Known officially as the ‘Quarter Acre Clause’, but thereafter more commonly referred to as the ‘Gregory Clause’, after much discussion the proposal eventually passed into law. This contentious clause had a detrimental impact on how the Great Irish Famine played out at a local level and would become a byword for landlord neglect and clearance. Almost as soon as it became law it had the effect of filling the already overcrowded Irish workhouse system and dominated debate both during and after the Famine. Moreover, the clause haunted Gregory and his legacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207