Configurational entropy, transition rates, and optimal interactions for rapid folding in coarse-grained model proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under certain conditions, the dynamics of coarse-grained models of solvated proteins can be described using a Markov state model, which tracks the evolution of populations of configurations. The transition rates among states that appear in the Markov model can be determined by computing the relative entropy of states and their mean first passage times. In this paper, we present an adaptive method to evaluate the configurational entropy and the mean first passage times for linear chain models with discontinuous potentials. The approach is based on event-driven dynamical sampling in a massively parallel architecture. Using the fact that the transition rate matrix can be calculated for any choice of interaction energies at any temperature, it is demonstrated how each state's energy can be chosen such that the average time to transition between any two states is minimized. The methods are used to analyze the optimization of the folding process of two protein systems: the crambin protein and a model with frustration and misfolding. It is shown that the folding pathways for both systems are comprised of two regimes: first, the rapid establishment of local bonds, followed by the subsequent formation of more distant contacts. The state energies that lead to the most rapid folding encourage multiple pathways, and they either penalize folding pathways through kinetic traps by raising the energies of trapping states or establish an escape route from the trapping states by lowering free energy barriers to other states that rapidly reach the native state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".