Domain Adaptation for Object Classification in Point Clouds via Asymmetrical Siamese and Conditional Adversarial Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, researchers have developed various deep neural networks for processing point clouds effectively. Due to the enormous parameters in deep learning-based models, a lot of manual efforts have to be invested into annotating sufficient training samples. To mitigate such manual efforts of annotating samples for a new scanning device, this letter focuses on proposing a new neural network to achieve domain adaptation in 3D object classification. Specifically, to minimize the data discrepancy of intra-class objects in different domains, an Asymmetrical Siamese module is designed to align the intra-class features. To preserve the discriminative information for distinguishing inter-class objects in different domains, a Conditional Adversarial module is leveraged to consider the classification information conveyed from the classifier. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method on object classification in heterogeneous point clouds, evaluations are conducted on three point cloud datasets, which are collected in different scenarios by different laser scanning devices. Furthermore, the comparative experiments also demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method on the classification accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".